New issue intake sorter
Reads each new issue on your repo and sorts it as ready to work, needs more info, or too big. You get a clean queue and reporters get asked for missing details.
What it does
- Reads each new or reopened issue and its comments
- Labels it ready, needs info, or needs splitting
- Drafts a question for the reporter when details are missing
- Rechecks waiting issues on weekday mornings
Your approval boundaries
Approval requiredThese actions always wait for your yes:
- Closing any issue
- Posting comments in public
- Merging any pull request
You decide what happens next.
More about this workflow
This setup is for developers and small engineering teams who want fewer chores. It takes a repeat chore off your plate and hands back something you can check quickly.
First, it reads each new or reopened issue and its comments. Next, it labels it ready, needs info, or needs splitting. Then it drafts a question for the reporter when details are missing. Finally, it rechecks waiting issues on weekday mornings. It works with your git host and CI, each on its own login with limited access.
You get the prep work done and waiting for you. The agent stops and asks for your yes before closing any issue, posting comments in public and merging any pull request, and says plainly if a step cannot be undone.
“a human approval is needed regardless of what bots do”
Explore required tools and model recommendations
Tools and access
GitHub
Handles the git host and ci part of this job. Grant a fine-grained token, read code and write comments.
API required: Yes. Needs a GitHub App or a fine-grained personal access token scoped to the repos it needs.
Official links only. Not sponsored, no affiliate links.
Model recommendations
Best pick
Claude Opus 5.5
Its maker points to it for long running coding work.
$4 per million input tokens, $20 per million output tokens.
Anthropic docs as of October 11, 2026
Cheaper backup
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Half the price per token and still strong for reviews and docs.
$2 per million input tokens, $10 per million output tokens.
Anthropic docs as of October 11, 2026
Our own picks. Not sponsored, no affiliate links.
Build your prompt
Add your details, then copy the prompt into your tool.
2Your prompt
4 of 4 still emptyYour answers stay in this browser only.
Run your workflow
Connect your tools with only the access this setup needs, then follow these steps.
Steps
Do these in order. Test on old data before it touches live work.
- 1Connect GitHub with its own login, not yours. Grant a fine-grained token, read code and write comments.
- 2Paste the prompt where your harness takes instructions. See the note under the Copy button.
- 3Do a dry run on old or test data first. Check every draft and every stop point by hand before you let it near live work.
- 4Read its log after the first real run. Only widen access once a week of runs looks clean.
Safeguards and trust score
The score describes this example setup’s access, approval boundaries, ability to undo changes, and scope.
Can draft things that send or spend, so it sits close to risky actions.
Waits for a yes on: closing any issue, posting comments in public, merging any pull request.
Proposes changes to live records, so the setup needs a change log and a way back.
Runs on its own login across 2 tools. Fewer connections means a smaller blast radius.
How to raise it
- Access: Take away its ability to send, post or spend. Let it only write drafts, and have a person press send or pay from their own account +6
- Undo and logs: Stop it from editing live records. Have it write the change as a proposal you apply, and keep a log of every change with a way to roll it back +3
- Scope: Run it on one tool only, with its own login that can see just what this job needs +2
Do all of these to reach 91, up from 80.
Want help getting there? Get an AI Trust Audit from Pixeldesigns
Reviewed by Trustcase (example setup). How scoring works
Embed badge
Show this trust score on your site or README. It links back here.
[](https://trustcase.dev/use-cases/new-issue-intake-sorter)<a href="https://trustcase.dev/use-cases/new-issue-intake-sorter"><img src="https://trustcase.dev/badge/new-issue-intake-sorter.svg" alt="Trustcase trust score for New issue intake sorter" height="20"></a>More engineering workflows
- Merged changes digest
Reads every pull request merged since the last run and writes a short digest of what changed. Each change is sorted by who it matters to and how big it is.
- Morning QA report
Runs a set of read-only checks on your codebase each morning and files one report issue. It starts as an observer and only gets more power when you grant it.
- Upstream blocker recheck
Once a month, re-tests the upstream bugs and missing releases your work is waiting on. Tells you which ones have cleared.
- Daily public exploit digest
Each day it checks public exploit sources for high severity flaws that just got working exploit code. It keeps one running monthly list so you know what to patch first.