Skip to content

Morning ticket dashboard with tick to approve queue

Every morning an agent refreshes a one screen dashboard in your notes from the issue tracker, your workstream notes and inbox. It reads only, proposes board changes as checkboxes and drafts first pass PR reviews that are never posted.

EngineeringWorks with Claude Code · Cursor+1Community example
Build your promptSee requirements

What it does

  • Reads your tickets, pull requests waiting on you and workstream notes
  • Writes today's priorities and nudges to one dashboard note
  • Lists proposed ticket changes as checkboxes in a separate note
  • Drafts a first pass review for each waiting PR
  • Runs a Friday sweep for stale items and a status report draft

Your approval boundaries

Approval required

These actions always wait for your yes:

  • Ticking any proposed change
  • Posting a comment or review, after seeing the exact calls

You decide what happens next.

More about this workflow

This setup is for developers and small engineering teams who want fewer chores. It takes a repeat chore off your plate and hands back something you can check quickly.

First, it reads your tickets, pull requests waiting on you and workstream notes. Next, it writes today's priorities and nudges to one dashboard note. Then it lists proposed ticket changes as checkboxes in a separate note. After that, it drafts a first pass review for each waiting PR. Finally, it runs a Friday sweep for stale items and a status report draft. It works with your issue tracker, git host and notes app, each on its own login with limited access.

You get the prep work done and waiting for you. The agent stops and asks for your yes before ticking any proposed change and posting a comment or review, after seeing the exact calls, and says plainly if a step cannot be undone.

“Jira comments are drafted, never posted”
bcgov bcgov on GitHub · Oct 20, 2026
Before you startIssue tracker · Git host accessScoped permissionsClaude Code or Cursor
Explore required tools and model recommendations

Tools and access

  • Linear

    Handles the issue tracker part of this job. Grant read plus create in one triage team.

    API required: Yes. Needs a personal API key or an OAuth app.

    Sign up: Linear

  • GitHub

    Handles the git host part of this job. Grant a fine-grained token, read code and write comments.

    API required: Yes. Needs a GitHub App or a fine-grained personal access token scoped to the repos it needs.

    Sign up: Create a GitHub account

  • Notion

    Handles the notes app part of this job. Grant only the pages it needs, read first.

    API required: Yes. Needs a Notion integration. You choose which pages it can see by sharing them with it.

    Sign up: Notion

Official links only. Not sponsored, no affiliate links.

Model recommendations

Best pick

Claude Opus 5.5

Its maker points to it for long running coding work.

$4 per million input tokens, $20 per million output tokens.

Anthropic docs as of October 11, 2026

Cheaper backup

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Half the price per token and still strong for reviews and docs.

$2 per million input tokens, $10 per million output tokens.

Anthropic docs as of October 11, 2026

Our own picks. Not sponsored, no affiliate links.

Build your prompt

Add your details, then copy the prompt into your tool.

1Your details

Fill these in and the prompt updates as you type.

2Your prompt

4 of 4 still empty
Fill these in before you run it: [ISSUE TRACKER PROJECT] [WORKSTREAM NOTES FOLDER] [REFRESH TIME] [REVIEW REPOS] You are the Morning ticket dashboard with tick to approve queue agent. Every morning an agent refreshes a one screen dashboard in your notes from the issue tracker, your workstream notes and inbox. It reads only, proposes board changes as checkboxes and drafts first pass PR reviews that are never posted. Use only the details filled in above. If any [BRACKETED] item is still blank or unclear, stop and ask for it first. Do not guess. What you do on your own: - Reads your tickets, pull requests waiting on you and workstream notes - Writes today's priorities and nudges to one dashboard note - Lists proposed ticket changes as checkboxes in a separate note - Drafts a first pass review for each waiting PR - Runs a Friday sweep for stale items and a status report draft What you must never do without a yes from a person: - Ticking any proposed change - Posting a comment or review, after seeing the exact calls Rules: - Before any step on the list above, stop and ask. Say in plain words what you want to do, who it affects, and whether it can be undone. - If something cannot be undone, say so first, in one short line. - Write drafts, not final actions. A person sends, pays, posts, or deletes. - Keep a short log of every action you took and every source you read. - If you are unsure, ask instead of guessing.
View run instructionsPaste into: Claude Code, Cursor, Claude Desktop with MCP

Your answers stay in this browser only.

Run your workflow

Connect your tools with only the access this setup needs, then follow these steps.

Steps

Do these in order. Test on old data before it touches live work.

  1. 1Connect Linear with its own login, not yours. Grant read plus create in one triage team.
  2. 2Connect GitHub with its own login, not yours. Grant a fine-grained token, read code and write comments.
  3. 3Connect Notion with its own login, not yours. Grant only the pages it needs, read first.
  4. 4Paste the prompt where your harness takes instructions. See the note under the Copy button.
  5. 5Do a dry run on old or test data first. Check every draft and every stop point by hand before you let it near live work.
  6. 6Read its log after the first real run. Only widen access once a week of runs looks clean.

Safeguards and trust score

The score describes this example setup’s access, approval boundaries, ability to undo changes, and scope.

Access18 / 30

Can draft things that send or spend, so it sits close to risky actions.

Human approval30 / 30

Waits for a yes on: ticking any proposed change, posting a comment or review, after seeing the exact calls.

Undo and logs14 / 20

Proposes changes to live records, so the setup needs a change log and a way back.

Scope16 / 20

Runs on its own login across 3 tools. Fewer connections means a smaller blast radius.

How to raise it

  • Access: Take away its ability to send, post or spend. Let it only write drafts, and have a person press send or pay from their own account +6
  • Undo and logs: Stop it from editing live records. Have it write the change as a proposal you apply, and keep a log of every change with a way to roll it back +3
  • Scope: Cut it down from 3 connected tools to the 2 it needs most, each with its own limited login instead of your full account +2

Do all of these to reach 89, up from 78.

Want help getting there? Get an AI Trust Audit from Pixeldesigns

Reviewed by Trustcase (example setup). How scoring works

Embed badge

Show this trust score on your site or README. It links back here.

Trustcase trust score badge
Markdown
[![Trustcase trust score for Morning ticket dashboard with tick to approve queue](https://trustcase.dev/badge/morning-ticket-dashboard-with-tick-to-approve-queue.svg)](https://trustcase.dev/use-cases/morning-ticket-dashboard-with-tick-to-approve-queue)
HTML
<a href="https://trustcase.dev/use-cases/morning-ticket-dashboard-with-tick-to-approve-queue"><img src="https://trustcase.dev/badge/morning-ticket-dashboard-with-tick-to-approve-queue.svg" alt="Trustcase trust score for Morning ticket dashboard with tick to approve queue" height="20"></a>

More engineering workflows

  • Weekly repo security and docs pulse

    Two weekly runs for people who maintain more repos than they can watch. One opens a single security issue per repo with triaged findings, the other opens one pull request fixing docs that drifted from the code.

  • Pull request reviewer

    Gives every PR a first pass before a person looks.

  • Flaky test hunter

    Finds tests that fail at random and why.

  • Incident timeline

    Builds the timeline during an outage so people can focus on the fix.