Skip to content

Integration research sweep

Checks a long list of products for APIs, sign in methods, MCP support and how hard they are to connect. You still spot check the findings before trusting them.

EngineeringWorks with Claude Code · Cursor+2Community example
Build your promptSee requirements

What it does

  • Reads each product's developer docs
  • Notes API, auth and MCP support
  • Rates how easy it is to integrate
  • Links the source for every claim

Your approval boundaries

Read only

Reads connected data. It does not send messages or change records.

You decide what happens next.

More about this workflow

This setup is for developers and small engineering teams who want fewer chores. It takes a repeat chore off your plate and hands back something you can check quickly.

First, it reads each product's developer docs. Next, it notes API, auth and MCP support. Then it rates how easy it is to integrate. Finally, it links the source for every claim. It works with your web search and spreadsheet, each on its own login with limited access.

You get the finished work, ready to read. It only reads, so nothing is sent, changed or paid for. You decide what to do with it.

“checking if its research was actually correct”
Abhishek @Abhi_SDev · Sep 20, 2026
Before you startWeb search · Spreadsheet accessRead-only permissionsClaude Code or Cursor
Explore required tools and model recommendations

Tools and access

  • Web search

    Handles the web search part of this job. Grant public search results only.

    API required: Optional. Built into most agent harnesses. A standalone search API needs its own key.

    No sign-up needed

  • Google Sheets

    Handles the spreadsheet part of this job. Grant access to the single sheet it needs.

    API required: Yes. Needs a Google Cloud OAuth app or a service account with the Sheets API turned on.

    Sign up: Google Workspace

Official links only. Not sponsored, no affiliate links.

Model recommendations

Best pick

Claude Opus 5.5

Its maker points to it for long running coding work.

$4 per million input tokens, $20 per million output tokens.

Anthropic docs as of October 11, 2026

Cheaper backup

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Half the price per token and still strong for reviews and docs.

$2 per million input tokens, $10 per million output tokens.

Anthropic docs as of October 11, 2026

Our own picks. Not sponsored, no affiliate links.

Build your prompt

Add your details, then copy the prompt into your tool.

1Your details

Fill these in and the prompt updates as you type.

list

e.g. API, auth, MCP

2Your prompt

3 of 3 still empty
Fill these in before you run it: [THE PRODUCTS TO CHECK: list] [WHAT TO CHECK FOR: e.g. API, auth, MCP] [WHERE TO SAVE THE TABLE] You are the Integration research sweep agent. Checks a long list of products for APIs, sign in methods, MCP support and how hard they are to connect. You still spot check the findings before trusting them. Use only the details filled in above. If any [BRACKETED] item is still blank or unclear, stop and ask for it first. Do not guess. What you do on your own: - Reads each product's developer docs - Notes API, auth and MCP support - Rates how easy it is to integrate - Links the source for every claim What you must never do without a yes from a person: - Anything that writes, sends, or spends. This job only reads. Rules: - Before any step on the list above, stop and ask. Say in plain words what you want to do, who it affects, and whether it can be undone. - If something cannot be undone, say so first, in one short line. - Write drafts, not final actions. A person sends, pays, posts, or deletes. - Keep a short log of every action you took and every source you read. - If you are unsure, ask instead of guessing.
View run instructionsPaste into: Claude Code, Cursor, OpenAI Agents SDK, LangGraph

Your answers stay in this browser only.

Run your workflow

Connect your tools with only the access this setup needs, then follow these steps.

Steps

Do these in order. Test on old data before it touches live work.

  1. 1Set up Web search. Keep it to public search results only.
  2. 2Connect Google Sheets with its own login, not yours. Grant access to the single sheet it needs.
  3. 3Paste the prompt where your harness takes instructions. See the note under the Copy button.
  4. 4Do a dry run on old or test data first. Check every draft and every stop point by hand before you let it near live work.
  5. 5Read its log after the first real run. Only widen access once a week of runs looks clean.

Safeguards and trust score

The score describes this example setup’s access, approval boundaries, ability to undo changes, and scope.

Access30 / 30

Read only. It never writes, sends or spends.

Human approval30 / 30

Nothing to approve, it only reads.

Undo and logs20 / 20

No changes to undo. Reads can be logged.

Scope18 / 20

Runs on its own login across 2 tools. Fewer connections means a smaller blast radius.

How to raise it

Nothing major to fix. One polish tip: show a short daily log of what it read, so you can spot it reaching for anything new.

Reviewed by Trustcase (example setup). How scoring works

Embed badge

Show this trust score on your site or README. It links back here.

Trustcase trust score badge
Markdown
[![Trustcase trust score for Integration research sweep](https://trustcase.dev/badge/integration-research-sweep.svg)](https://trustcase.dev/use-cases/integration-research-sweep)
HTML
<a href="https://trustcase.dev/use-cases/integration-research-sweep"><img src="https://trustcase.dev/badge/integration-research-sweep.svg" alt="Trustcase trust score for Integration research sweep" height="20"></a>

More engineering workflows

  • Workflow builder by chat

    Builds automation workflows from plain language instructions instead of dragging nodes by hand. You review and test each workflow before turning it on.

  • Meeting notes to issues

    Turns meeting notes into draft issues and specs so follow ups do not get lost. You review the list before anything is filed.

  • Broken link sweep

    Checks every link on your docs or site each week and proposes fixes for the dead ones. A person confirms each fix before it goes live.

  • Weekly codebase review report

    Once a week it reviews the whole repo, focusing on what changed since last time. It tracks each finding as new, still open or fixed, and nothing blocks on it.