As built docs updated from change evidence
Takes a diff, deploy result or test result and drafts matching updates to your architecture doc, config guide and change log. It never claims more than the evidence proves, and writes only the edits you approve.
What it does
- Redacts secrets from the evidence before reading it
- Picks which docs, sections and rows the change affects
- Caps each status at what the evidence can prove
- Shows the diff and any open questions
- Refuses to write if a doc changed since the proposal
Your approval boundaries
Creates draftsThese actions always wait for your yes:
- Writing any edit to the docs
- Marking anything as verified on a person's word
You decide what happens next.
More about this workflow
This setup is for developers and small engineering teams who want fewer chores. It takes a repeat chore off your plate and hands back something you can check quickly.
First, it redacts secrets from the evidence before reading it. Next, it picks which docs, sections and rows the change affects. Then it caps each status at what the evidence can prove. After that, it shows the diff and any open questions. Finally, it refuses to write if a doc changed since the proposal. It works with your git host and docs, each on its own login with limited access.
You get the prep work done and waiting for you. The agent stops and asks for your yes before writing any edit to the docs and marking anything as verified on a person's word, and says plainly if a step cannot be undone.
“writes only the edits you approve.”
Explore required tools and model recommendations
Tools and access
GitHub
Handles the git host part of this job. Grant a fine-grained token, read code and write comments.
API required: Yes. Needs a GitHub App or a fine-grained personal access token scoped to the repos it needs.
Google Docs
Handles the docs part of this job. Grant one folder, create and edit only.
API required: Yes. Needs a Google Cloud OAuth app with the Docs API turned on.
Official links only. Not sponsored, no affiliate links.
Model recommendations
Best pick
Claude Opus 5.5
Its maker points to it for long running coding work.
$4 per million input tokens, $20 per million output tokens.
Anthropic docs as of October 11, 2026
Cheaper backup
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Half the price per token and still strong for reviews and docs.
$2 per million input tokens, $10 per million output tokens.
Anthropic docs as of October 11, 2026
Our own picks. Not sponsored, no affiliate links.
Build your prompt
Add your details, then copy the prompt into your tool.
2Your prompt
3 of 3 still emptyYour answers stay in this browser only.
Run your workflow
Connect your tools with only the access this setup needs, then follow these steps.
Steps
Do these in order. Test on old data before it touches live work.
- 1Connect GitHub with its own login, not yours. Grant a fine-grained token, read code and write comments.
- 2Connect Google Docs with its own login, not yours. Grant one folder, create and edit only.
- 3Paste the prompt where your harness takes instructions. See the note under the Copy button.
- 4Do a dry run on old or test data first. Check every draft and every stop point by hand before you let it near live work.
- 5Read its log after the first real run. Only widen access once a week of runs looks clean.
Safeguards and trust score
The score describes this example setup’s access, approval boundaries, ability to undo changes, and scope.
Writes drafts and notes inside your tools, nothing leaves on its own.
Waits for a yes on: writing any edit to the docs, marking anything as verified on a person's word.
Leaves drafts you can throw away, with a record of what it made.
Runs on its own login across 2 tools. Fewer connections means a smaller blast radius.
How to raise it
- Scope: Run it on one tool only, with its own login that can see just what this job needs +2
Do all of these to reach 91, up from 89.
Want help getting there? Get an AI Trust Audit from Pixeldesigns
Reviewed by Trustcase (example setup). How scoring works
Embed badge
Show this trust score on your site or README. It links back here.
[](https://trustcase.dev/use-cases/as-built-docs-updated-from-change-evidence)<a href="https://trustcase.dev/use-cases/as-built-docs-updated-from-change-evidence"><img src="https://trustcase.dev/badge/as-built-docs-updated-from-change-evidence.svg" alt="Trustcase trust score for As built docs updated from change evidence" height="20"></a>More engineering workflows
- Pull request reviewer
Gives every PR a first pass before a person looks.
- Flaky test hunter
Finds tests that fail at random and why.
- Incident timeline
Builds the timeline during an outage so people can focus on the fix.
- Dependency updater
Keeps packages current without surprise breakage.
Other workflows that use the same tools
- Morning signal sweep with sales handoff budget
Sales. Each morning it reads every new account signal against your written ICP, stage rules and plays, and proposes which ones become a sales handoff, with the evidence cited. Sales never gets more handoffs than the weekly budget, and nothing is sent or written to the CRM.
- Proposal first draft
Sales. Builds a proposal from your template and the discovery notes.
- Weekly ops report
Operations. Writes the Monday numbers summary so you do not build it by hand.